Much talk about insuring people for health care needs. The giant bedpan in the room is availability. What good is having Medicare, Medicaid, exchange plans, if you cannot find a doctor for hundreds of miles who will accept your provider’s coverage? Just look.
The pundits talk about providing millions of people “access” to healthcare; however, they cannot explain why many of the “covered” still do what they did when they had no insurance, go the emergency room of the public hospital known to be the one that cannot turn them down.
Health insurers specify what they will cover and what the insured must pay, in terms of dollars and percentages. What they do not spell out, is the amounts they are willing to pay the doctors and hospitals for various treatments. The doctors and hospitals that are willing to accept the insurer’s terms are added to a “network.” If the insured uses these doctors and hospitals, “in network,” the patient pays less; “out-of-network” providers, the insured pays much more.
Medicare, and the related private insurance plans are shunned by many healthcare providers because of the intense complexity of coding rules, poorer reimbursement rates, and 6-month slow-pay of claims. I cannot blame them for wanting the easiest, most profitable patients, but look at what that does to retirees: it shoves them into the offices of the newest, least experienced doctors, who do not have privileges at the best hospitals.
Another specious barrier doctors erect is “not accepting new patients.” If that is true, why do they prominently promote their doctors, facilities, and services? Why do they list the insurance plans they accept, on fancy websites? What do they do when patients get well, move, change, outgrow their need, or die? Who takes their places? Are there waiting lists? This policy seems wildly inconsistent, and dubious to me.
Today’s labyrinth of laws, maze of insurance coverages, intricacies of medical practice, incorporation of hospitals, vast array of medical devices, tests, and procedures, and incomprehensible myriads of drugs and medicines, are the starting point of future choices. The concept of choosing your doctors, clinics, and hospitals still appeals to me. If all health insurance policies must meet some minimum standards of coverage, why should health providers exclude any of them?
We have a historic opportunity to put features into the fabric of healthcare; the federal government has more incentives and flexibility to “get it right” as they formulate new laws. Why not pass a new law called “The Available Care Act?” If you accept anything except cash for medical services or goods, you accept the coverage of any patient who walks in your door.