Numbers can deceive when important details are left out. The recent Congressional Budget Office assessment of the Senate Republican healthcare bill estimated the reduction in the number of people covered by health insurance.
Most of the coverage dropped would be because of state laws, not federal. The states set Medicaid coverage standards.
Another big chunk of the “losses” would be those who did not want coverage anyway. Those forced to buy by the mandate penalties.
According to Politico:
<The House Republican health care overhaul would repeal the individual mandate penalty, and according to the CBO, this would be the single biggest driver of raising the uninsured rate by 14 million next year.
“Most of that increase would stem from repealing the penalties associated with the individual mandate,” the CBO report reads. “Some of those people would choose not to have insurance because they chose to be covered by insurance under current law only to avoid paying the penalties, and some people would forgo insurance in response to higher premiums” (emphasis ours).>
The projected 30% reduction in premiums should help some, but the out-of-pocket costs might still leave some people out.
Who says the people insured are “covered?” Some people wait more than a month, and then drive 50 miles to see the only doctor who accepts Medicaid, or a high-deductible “bronze” plan from the only remaining insurer.
Bernie Sanders’ assertion that “thousands” of “excess deaths” would result is based on numbers from studies of people with untreated, cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. This same population could get no or inadequate treatment under Medicaid and low-end health insurance coverage.
And, what if the newly uninsured population is skewed towards young, healthy people who just dropped out? Would the results be as dire?
Without a detailed demographic breakdown of the CBO numbers, we are left to speculate and infer what we choose.