The most sacrosanct assumptions in projections of the future pertain to the uninhibited “right” to have children. Arguments galore might pan the notion that having children is not a right, it is a luxury the future may not afford.
What is the source of pollution?
What is the source of famine?
What is the source of war?
The answer to all the problems posed by fatalists is simple: people.
People, from birth to grave consume and emit. Without technology, with technology, it does not matter. Being alive adds to the problems we work so hard to offset. Yes, you and I demand food, water, clothing, shelter, and many products and services that require resources.
In the extractive era, all we had to do was harvest. We fished, hunted, drank water, felled trees, built fires, made tools, developed agriculture, and diverted rivers to allow us to harvest even more from nature. And what did we contribute in exchange for the bounty we consumed? Effluence.
So vast was the trove of resources, we had the energy, tools, and bodies to plant and husband, delve and drill, sail and dive, smelt and forge ourselves weapons and consumptive infrastructures.
The constant threat of extinction was real and constant. The rate of mortality for mothers and babies was daunting. The mortality of hunters and soldiers was also constant. Not only was procreation allowed, it was demanded of women by men, relatives, and religions.
Numerous times, depopulation was significant, through wars and diseases. The specter of extinction haunted our species, and still does in nuclear and cosmic ways.
It is ironic that the solution to our fears is the source of our threats – more people. Preserving resources ranks lower than species’ survival. Increasing consumption of resources, and the byproducts that creates, threatens our existence.
Our nature demands that we dig our own graves, rather than curb our breeding. Is it wrong? Define wrong.